Photo gate first
CCA checks whether the front and back are present, readable, high-resolution, and usable. Bad evidence should be recaptured before any grade estimate matters.
CCA Matrix V1.2
CardCheck.ai is a submission decision system. It does not promise an official grade; it organizes the visible evidence so collectors can decide whether a raw card deserves the next spend.
CCA checks whether the front and back are present, readable, high-resolution, and usable. Bad evidence should be recaptured before any grade estimate matters.
The report looks for name, set, card number, language, copyright line, and variant cues. A card cannot be valued or compared confidently if the identity is unclear.
Centering, corners, edges, and surface are reported separately. This makes the score explainable and gives collectors a practical reason for the range.
The final output is not just a big number. CCA recommends submit, maybe submit, sell raw, keep, skip, or recapture based on visible risk and confidence.
Workflow FAQ
A CCA report is a photo-based pre-grading estimate, not an official grade. It is useful for spotting visible grade risk and deciding whether a card deserves official submission, but it cannot guarantee PSA, BGS, CGC, SGC, TAG, or any other grading-company result.
If the evidence is blurry, cropped, mismatched, low resolution, glare-heavy, or otherwise unreliable, CardCheck.ai can route the result to recapture instead of forcing a misleading grade estimate.
Yes. The report is designed around a practical submission decision: submit, maybe submit, sell raw, keep, skip, or recapture based on visible condition risk, confidence, and the likely grading upside.
Official grading costs money and time. A CCA report gives collectors a conservative checkpoint before submitting: is the card photo evidence strong enough, are there obvious grade caps, and does the likely upside justify the next step?
View sample report Read the photo guide